A case study in Fissure Universe 7 DOTA2 pricing: How to Calculate Fair Match Prices When Draws Pay Half
When betting markets offer odds on teams going 2-0 in a best-of-two series, but draws (1-1 results) are resolved by awarding each team half a win, how do we determine the fair price for each team to "win" the match? This article walks through the mathematical framework and provides practical Excel formulas.
The Problem Setup
Consider a best-of-two series between 1win (the underdog) and Avulus (the favorite) where:
- 1win is +350 to go 2-0 (4.50 in decimal odds)
- Avulus is +250 to go 2-0 (2.50 in decimal odds)
- Draws (1-1 split) are resolved at 0.50 (each team receives half credit)
We need to find fair prices for assets that pay out $1 if that team wins, where the prices should sum to 1.
Understanding Best-of-Two Series
In a best-of-two series, there are three possible outcomes:
- Team A wins 2-0 (wins both games)
- Team B wins 2-0 (wins both games)
- Draw 1-1 (each team wins one game)
Unlike best-of-three series where one team must eventually win, best-of-two series naturally allow for ties.
Step 1: Convert Odds to Implied Probabilities
First, we extract the implied probabilities from the given odds. For decimal odds, the implied probability is simply:
Implied Probability = 1 / Decimal Odds
For our match:
- P(1win goes 2-0) = 1/4.50 = 0.2222 (22.22%)
- P(Avulus goes 2-0) = 1/2.50 = 0.4000 (40.00%)
- P(Draw 1-1) = 1 - 0.2222 - 0.4000 = 0.3778 (37.78%)
These three probabilities sum to 100%, covering all possible outcomes in the best-of-two series.
Step 2: Calculate Expected Payouts
Since a 1-1 draw awards 0.5 to each team rather than 0, we need to calculate each team's expected payout across all scenarios.
1win's Expected Payout:
- Win 2-0: Pays 1.0 with probability 0.2222 โ 1.0 ร 0.2222 = 0.2222
- Draw 1-1: Pays 0.5 with probability 0.3778 โ 0.5 ร 0.3778 = 0.1889
- Lose 0-2: Pays 0.0 with probability 0.4000 โ 0.0 ร 0.4000 = 0.0000
- Total expected payout: 0.2222 + 0.1889 = 0.4111
Avulus's Expected Payout:
- Win 2-0: Pays 1.0 with probability 0.4000 โ 1.0 ร 0.4000 = 0.4000
- Draw 1-1: Pays 0.5 with probability 0.3778 โ 0.5 ร 0.3778 = 0.1889
- Lose 0-2: Pays 0.0 with probability 0.2222 โ 0.0 ร 0.2222 = 0.0000
- Total expected payout: 0.4000 + 0.1889 = 0.5889
Verification: 0.4111 + 0.5889 = 1.0000 โ
This is exactly what we need: prices that sum to 1, representing a complete probability distribution.
The General Formula
For any team X with given odds to go 2-0 in a best-of-two series, the fair price is:
Fair Price(X) = P(X wins 2-0) + (R ร P(Draw 1-1))
Where:
- P(X wins 2-0) = 1 / Odds_X (to go 2-0)
- P(Draw 1-1) = 1 - 1/Odds_A - 1/Odds_B
- R = Draw resolution value (0.5 in this case)
Expanding this formula:
Fair Price(X) = 1/Odds_X + 0.5 ร (1 - 1/Odds_A - 1/Odds_B)
Excel Implementation
Here's how to implement this in Excel:
Setup:
- A1: 1win decimal odds to go 2-0 (4.50 for +350 American)
- B1: Avulus decimal odds to go 2-0 (2.50 for +250 American)
- C1: Draw resolution value (0.5)
Formulas:
// 1win Fair Price
=1/A1 + C1*(1-1/A1-1/B1)
// Avulus Fair Price
=1/B1 + C1*(1-1/A1-1/B1)
Converting American Odds to Decimal (if needed):
// For positive American odds (e.g., +350)
=(American_Odds/100) + 1
// For negative American odds (e.g., -150)
=(100/ABS(American_Odds)) + 1
Final Results
Using our example:
| Team | Odds to go 2-0 | American | Fair Price |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1win (Underdog) | 4.50 | +350 | 41.11ยข |
| Avulus (Favorite) | 2.50 | +250 | 58.89ยข |
| Total | - | - | 100.00ยข |
Interpretation
These fair prices tell us that:
- An asset paying $1 if 1win wins the series should trade at $0.4111
- An asset paying $1 if Avulus wins the series should trade at $0.5889
- Despite being the underdog in the 2-0 market, 1win has a 41% chance of "winning" due to the 1-1 draw resolution favoring both teams equally
Key Insights
- Draw resolution matters: With 1-1 draws paying 0.5 to each team, both teams benefit from the draw probability (37.78%), which pulls their fair prices closer together than the outright 2-0 odds suggest.
- Prices sum to 1: This framework ensures a coherent probability distribution, essential for prediction markets and portfolio-based betting.
- Best-of-two structure: Unlike best-of-three or best-of-five series where someone must win, best-of-two series have substantial draw probability, making the resolution rule critically important.
- The formula generalizes: Change the draw resolution value (R) to any number between 0 and 1 to model different payout structures (e.g., R=0 means draws pay nothing, R=1 means draws count as full wins).
Practical Applications
This methodology is valuable for:
- Prediction markets pricing binary outcomes with partial resolution
- Esports betting where best-of-two formats are common
- Portfolio optimization when allocating across correlated assets
- Arbitrage detection by comparing market prices to fair values
This mathematically sound approach to price discovery can be applied to any market structure where intermediate outcomes have fractional payouts.